Ahead of the 61st Session of the Human Rights Council, the signatory Syrian civil society organisations urge Member States to renew the mandate of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic in full under Item 4 of the Council’s agenda.
Although the fall of the Assad regime has altered the political context, the Commission’s role is more critical than ever. At this pivotal stage, its findings and recommendations can meaningfully contribute to tangible accountability and institutional reform. For over a decade, the CoI has established the most authoritative and credible record of violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law in Syria. Its rigor and impartiality provides an essential benchmark against which domestic accountability processes can be measured. Far from undermining national institutions, international independent accountability mechanisms strengthen their credibility by reinforcing adherence to international standards.
Despite the fall of the Assad regime and the steps undertaken by the Syrian transitional government, the human rights situation in Syria continues to meet the threshold for Item 4 scrutiny. In 2025, grave violations have persisted, including massacres in the Coastal areas and in Sweida as well as the abductions of women, arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance, and other abuses committed by multiple actors. These violations, and their re-occurrence in early 2026, demonstrate that the gravity and scale of abuses remain of serious concern.
The actions taken by the transitional government in this regard still lack the trust and confidence of the affected communities, and still fall short of international standards of independence, impartiality, transparency and access to effective remedies for victims. This further underscores the importance for full renewal of CoI under Item 4 in order to ensure credibility and confidence in the justice process, and to show transitional government’s willingness to build trust with affected communities.
Moreover, fundamental questions regarding the inclusivity of Syria’s transition and its adherence to rule of law and political and civil rights remain unresolved. Sustained international engagement through a strong, independent, and adequately resourced Commission remains essential to support Syria toward a transition that is inclusive and fully compliant with international human rights standards.
Shifting Syria from Item 4 or imposing any change to its core mandate, work and power is premature and not reflective of the reality on the ground, especially in regards to lack of access to justice for victims. Any such changes should not be the result of abrupt and unilateral political decisions taken shortly before a Council session, but rather must be the result of sustained dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry and Syrian civil society, affected communities and victims’ associations. Furthermore, any exit strategy should only be based on objective criteria relating to the human rights situation, and on tangible improvement and independently verified progress in accountability and institutional reform.
Any change to the CoI’s mandate or agenda item would erode accountability, marginalise victims and jeopardize the prospects for a future Syria founded on justice, equality before the law and respect for human rights.
Signatories: